BIONICLEsector01 talk:Articles for Creation

From BIONICLEsector01, working on 1,551 articles.

Jump to: navigation, search

Talk Calmly
Discussion for individual Articles for Creation may escalate into heated debate. It is essential that you try to keep a cool head when voting and commenting here.

Notice
Please remember that only staff members are allowed to remove things from the AfC talkpage. If you did this in the past and didn't know it was not allowed, don't sweat it; simply remember not to do it again.

Contents

Tuyet's Empire

I think this should be added to the factions template and maybe have its own page. It is a faction right? I mean the Lo6K was an empire. Plus species from another dimension are in the species nav. So why not have a faction from another dimension in the factions nav. -MB17

Yes

  1. -MB17
  2. -Non-BS01 Image/Contribs/My Sandbox/The Board Room/
  3. --Toatapio Nuva 13:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

No

  1. -hybrid (talk/contribs) 21:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
  2. --Bold Clone (You called?\My Résumé) 01:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  3. --~|ET|~ (Talk/Contribs)
  4. Not really a faction... --User:Swert Owner (Talk / BS01)
  5. Toa Rovan
  6. ~Lih
  7. --Dorek (Talk| Contribs) 01:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  8. -Lhiky
  9. Not even in the main universe, and only appeared in the web serial, so it shouldn't even be here, and it should stay on the Toa Empire Pocket Dimension page as it was. ~Nuparu1995 was here / Whine Here! / Lookit What I Did!
  10. What Nuparu1995 said. -Seanp12-KanohiJournal Trainee (My Page|"..."|Contributions)
  11. Honestly, I can't see how anyone could consider it a faction and not a government. The guy who'll steal your soul when you're not lookingPublic ContemplationNon-BS01 Image 00:23, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Add to template only

  1. Non-BS01 ImageNon-BS01 ImageNon-BS01 Image
  2. M.I.(UBs/Creation Lab)Non-BS01 Image
  3. Lesovikk1996 (Talk to Me!|My Contributions)
  4. --Ultima Kid--Proud Wiki-toran(Blah, Blah BlahWoah! I blew up WSU!Ahh! The sneevil are attacking!Look what I got!) 06:38, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  5. ~DB~ 20:39, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  6. Kol628, QuoteMaster

Comments

Your logic is sound, MB. I'm going to say add it the template as Toa Empire and have it redirect to Toa Empire Alternate Universe. We added the alternate dimension species to the SpeciesNav, so I have no problem with this. Non-BS01 ImageNon-BS01 ImageNon-BS01 Image

It's in an alternate dimension... so until Toa Tuyet gets revived, gets the other Olmak, reforms the Toa Empire and comes and invades the main dimension I'm saying no. Don't know why did the alternate species get added to the species list.. -hybrid (talk/contribs) 21:09, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Those aren't alternate species, they exit in our dimension as well. JoT took place in an alternate universe, which resulted with some unknown change in the past. Unless this change is what created the species (which is highly unlikely), there's no reason not to beleive they don't exit in the BIONICLE Galaxy. Greg Farshtey even said that somewhere. As for the Toa Empire, it does not exist at all in our dimension, so why should we have it? -Lhiky 02:06, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately, Lihky, you're slightly off; the CoS (NOT JoT) dimension is a Pocket Dimension, -not- alternate universe. --Dorek (Talk| Contribs) 05:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
It was a major faction in its locale, so I say yes (although its status is unknown). However, I agree with Triggy on the redirect. Kol628, QuoteMaster

Media Timeline

This would be a list of media such as books, movies, comics, serials, short stories, etc. in order of which they fit into the story. Not chronologically, but in the order of which BC1 and the first comic are parrelel, and so on. This way someone could go through all of the many things of the BIONICLE stroyline in the order they were meant to be read, when a newcomer to the line would have no idea where to start or would miss things such as the serials. Non-BS01 Imageraahlix

Yes

  1. Non-BS01 Imageraahlix
  2. Yup, good idea BoL (talk) 18:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  3. --MatoroIgnika
  4. Avlok
  5. ~DB~ 20:39, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  6. --...-Non-BS01 Image(Contributions/Sandbox!/Talk to me!) 21:06, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  7. Lesovikk1996 (Talk to Me!|My Contributions)
  8. That would be pretty useful... The guy who'll steal your soul when you're not lookingPublic ContemplationNon-BS01 Image
  9. What a clever EL Staffie...-Non-BS01 Image 03:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

No

  1. I see absolutely no point in this. --~|ET|~ (Talk/Contribs)
  2. Non-BS01 ImageNon-BS01 ImageNon-BS01 Image Since we're storyline, shouldn't we just stick with the status quo? ie telling the story how when it happened, not how when it was presented?
  3. I think that the genral idea is good, but I still vote no. I also agree on what Triggy said. --Toatapio Nuva 16:10, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  4. --Bold Clone (You called?\My Résumé) 16:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

@ET: It isn't done in the appearnaces section. Appearances are where characters appear chronologically. First of all, the Media Timeline would not be chronological, that's the whole point of it. Secondly, that's for characters only.
Our timelines are for story, not media. Perhaps you don't understand what I'm proposing. Non-BS01 Imageraahlix

But the Timeline is storyline, right? Avlok

Yes, I initially misinterpreted your words.

But that doesn't change the fact that I don't see a need. (Oh, and I'm fairly certain BZP's already beaten us to that. Why repeat what they've done?) --~|ET|~ (Talk/Contribs) 21:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm only (rarely at that) on the forums so I wouldn't know. Is it what I'm suggesting? Non-BS01 Imageraahlix
I partially agree with both sides. BZP has already done that, but it would still be useful. I'm not quite sure yet.-Seanp12-KanohiJournal Trainee (My Page|"..."|Contributions)

Gallery:Bara Magna

We are gonna make this eventually. That much is pretty assured, as we have galleries for Mata Nui(Location), Voya Nui, and Metru Nui. So, unless you think this is to early, I would like to nominate it for creation. ~DB~ 23:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes

  1. ~DB~
  2. --Wrinkledlion X Non-BS01 Image 00:29, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  3. Lesovikk1996 (Talk to Me!|My Contributions)
  4. Its going to happen sooner or later.--MatoroIgnika
  5. Yep -MB17
  6. Yes, we will need this.--...-Non-BS01 Image(Contributions/Sandbox!/Talk to me!) 03:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  7. --KZN02, The Master of Tediousness (Talk|Contribs) 03:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  8. Non-BS01 ImageNon-BS01 ImageNon-BS01 Image I was going to make one earlier today without the AfC because I knew it would happen.

No

Comments

Template:Scrollbox

I think it's necessary. I have heard many members that would like to do a scroll box. Also, I know that is needed a lot of coding to do this. I also think it would be neccesary for other articles.--...-Non-BS01 Image(Contributions/Sandbox!/Talk to me!) 02:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes

  1. I'd like one thank you. -MB17
  2. I find it difficult to have to copy it over again and again. -Non-BS01 Image 03:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

No

  1. Not needed.--MatoroIgnika

Comments

It is needed lots of coding to make a simple scrollbox, and, if we make a template, it will be easier.--...-Non-BS01 Image(Contributions/Sandbox!/Talk to me!) 03:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://biosector01.com/wiki/index.php/BIONICLEsector01_talk:Articles_for_Creation"
Personal tools